🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' youth". The policy could be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to pass a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a good foundation," commented the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong data".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who took her own life after viewing harmful online content contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws mandating guardian approval for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations take a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that governments globally are less and less willing to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.